Breaking the law in the name of the law – How citizens are systematically disenfranchised

Breaking the law in the name of the law - When the state itself becomes a lawbreaker

Do you believe that everything is above board in Germany? That authorities, courts, and the police always act within the law?

Then this article will open your eyes – and with a touch of humor. Because honestly: If it weren't so sad, it would almost be comedy.

The book "Breaking the Law in the Name of the Law" shows in detail how deeply the unjust system interferes with the everyday lives of many people – through foreclosures without any real legal basis, invalid administrative acts, missing signatures, and more. It is about nothing less than how citizens are systematically disenfranchised – under the guise of apparent order.

⚡ This system is based on false legitimacy – and it affects us all. That's why it's time to educate and act now.

And now be honest: Do you know this sentence?

“ This letter was generated automatically and is valid even without a signature. ”

Do you really believe this nonsense? Seriously? Then I might as well make my driver's license with Word. Or a marriage certificate. Without a signature. Because... the printer says yes?

📊 The great illusion: Is the Federal Republic of Germany really a state?

One of the central questions in the book:

"Does the Federal Republic of Germany fulfill all the requirements of a sovereign state?"

Based on the three-element doctrine (people, territory, state power), it is explained why many constitutional lawyers and judgments doubt precisely this.

⚡ Article 23 of the Basic Law has been deleted. The scope of application is missing. And without a scope of application, there is no valid law.

💯 Administrative acts without signature = invalid

A central point in the book: the requirement for a handwritten signature. According to Section 126 of the German Civil Code (BGB), official decisions must be signed. In practice? None of this applies.

No signature = no valid notice.

Tip for those affected: Check each notice for signature, order and legitimacy.

And the next time you receive a letter without a signature, just remember this sentence:

“This letter was generated automatically...”
Well then: Enjoy your meal. Hopefully the printer was legally certified. 😅

🔒 Enforcement: A “tool” without legal basis?

Many citizens report seizures, coercive detention or house searches in which:

• no valid court rulings were available

• no signed titles existed

• Bailiffs turn out to be "freelancers"

The book uses judgments and laws to show why many of these measures are unlawful – even though they seem like "normal everyday life."

🏳️ Why no one takes responsibility

A frightening chapter: civil servants who are no longer civil servants . Judges who invoke repealed laws. Police officers who act "on behalf of" but cannot prove any genuine legitimacy .

The question is no longer: "What is legal ?", but: "Who is liable?"

🧹 Conclusion: Time to recognize the injustice and act

"Breaking the Law in the Name of the Law" is not a "tin foil hat book," but a detailed collection of facts, judgments, and templates – for all those who:

• want to better understand their rights
• want to defend themselves against incorrect administrative acts
• no longer accept everything unquestioningly

📄 The book gives you tools – including sample letters, legal basics and plain language.

🔗 Read now & download PDF

📅 " Breaking the Law in the Name of the Law " – now available as a PDF at Fair-Shop-24.de or if you prefer the hardcover edition directly from << AMAZON >>

💬 I'm curious to hear your opinion: Do you also know this sentence? Have you ever received such letters?
Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments – I'm looking forward to it! 🤝